Understanding Children’s Act Custody and Contact Orders: Best Interests of the Child in South Africa
Few legal matters are as emotionally charged or as important as disputes concerning children. In South Africa, Children’s Act custody matters are governed by the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 (“the CA”), read together with section 28 of the Constitution. These laws place one principle above all others: the best interests of the child are paramount.
As a leading family law firm in Sandton, Michael Krawitz & Co., under the guidance of experienced practitioners such as Graeme Krawitz, regularly assists parents navigating custody, care, and contact disputes. This article explains how courts approach Children’s Act custody and contact orders, drawing on both statutory principles and judicial reasoning reflected in the recent judgment in Sisilana v Ndlwana.
The Constitutional Foundation: The Best Interests of the Child
Every Children’s Act custody matter begins with section 28 of the Constitution. As the Court emphasised:
“…every child has the rights set out in section 28 of the Constitution; …protection of children’s rights leads to a corresponding improvement in the lives of other sections of the community…”
This principle forms “the backbone of any application or action concerning children”.
Importantly, custody disputes are not about parental victory. They are about safeguarding stability, security, and development for the child.
What Is Children’s Act Custody?
In modern South African law, the word “custody” is less commonly used. The Children’s Act refers to:
- Care
- Contact
- Parental responsibilities and rights
- Primary residence
However, the public still widely uses the term Children’s Act custody, and courts understand it to mean primary care and residence arrangements.
Section 7 of the Children’s Act sets out the factors courts must consider when determining the best interests of a child. As the Court explained:
“The best-interests standard is not a single test but a composite weighing of all relevant circumstances to ensure that the child’s welfare is paramount.”
This means there is no rigid formula. Each case is fact-specific.
Parental Rights of Unmarried Fathers: A Common Misunderstanding
A recurring issue in Children’s Act custody disputes is the mistaken belief that unmarried fathers automatically have lesser rights.
Section 21 of the Children’s Act provides that an unmarried father acquires full parental responsibilities and rights if:
- He lived with the mother in a permanent life partnership at birth; or
- He consented to be identified as the father; and
- Contributed in good faith to the child’s upbringing and maintenance.
The Court in the attached judgment made it clear:
“From the quoted extract it is an undeniable fact that Respondent has indeed acquired full parental responsibilities and rights.”
This reinforces a crucial point: biological mothers do not automatically “own” custody, nor are fathers automatically secondary.
Both parents may be co-holders of parental responsibilities under section 30 of the Act.
The Importance of Stability and Primary Care
South African courts are deeply cautious about uprooting young children without compelling justification.
In the judgment, the Court emphasised that:
“The court has a duty to secure and ensure stability in the lives of children.”
If a child has been residing primarily with one parent for a substantial period, courts are slow to disturb that arrangement unless:
- The child is neglected or abused;
- There is proven instability;
- The move is demonstrably in the child’s best interests.
Emotional disputes between parents, however intense, are not enough.
When Can a Parent Apply for Children’s Act Custody or Contact?
Section 23 of the Children’s Act allows a parent (or certain third parties) to apply for care or contact.
However, as the Court warned, litigation must not be driven by anger or vengeance:
“The application was found on raw emotion and anger and as such perhaps sought prematurely and without evidence…”
Michael Krawitz & Co. often advises clients that court should be a last resort. Mediation, parenting plans, and engagement through the Office of the Family Advocate are usually preferable first steps.
Jurisdiction in Children’s Act Custody Matters
Another critical technical issue is jurisdiction.
Section 44 of the Children’s Act states that the children’s court with jurisdiction is the court where the child is ordinarily resident.
In the attached judgment, the Court dismissed the application partly because the children were not ordinarily resident within that court’s jurisdiction
This highlights an important legal principle:
You cannot choose a court merely for convenience.
Contact Orders: The Child’s Right, Not Just the Parent’s
Courts repeatedly affirm that contact is not simply a parental privilege; it is a child’s right.
As the Court observed:
“A parent clothed with permanent residence of the children shall not unreasonably withhold the other parent from contact… Conversely, the right of the children to access to the other parent shall not be infringed unduly.”
Even where primary residence is awarded to one parent, liberal contact is generally encouraged, unless there are proven risks.
When Will Courts Refuse to Change Custody?
Courts will be reluctant to alter primary residence where:
- The child is well cared for;
- There is no evidence of neglect or harm;
- The existing arrangement was consensual;
- The application is based primarily on emotional conflict.
In the judgment, the Court found:
“There is no evidence to even suggest that the children were not taken care of, neglected, abused or that their interests were not best catered for…”
Without evidence of harm, courts prioritise continuity.
The Role of the Family Advocate
Before major changes to Children’s Act custody arrangements are made, courts often involve:
- The Office of the Family Advocate
- Social workers
- Psychologists
Parenting plans may be drafted and registered to formalise rights and responsibilities.
This structured process ensures that the outcome is child-focused, not parent-driven.
The Michael Krawitz & Co. Approach
Our experienced family law team approaches Children’s Act custody matters with:
- Strategic legal analysis
- Sensitivity to emotional dynamics
- Strong litigation capability
- A focus on negotiated outcomes where possible
We understand that custody disputes are not just legal battles; they are life-altering decisions affecting children’s futures.
Our role is to protect both your parental rights and, most importantly, your child’s best interests.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Children’s Act Custody
What does Children’s Act custody mean in South Africa?
It refers to arrangements concerning care, primary residence, and contact under the Children’s Act 38 of 2005.
Do unmarried fathers have equal custody rights?
Yes, if they meet the requirements under section 21 of the Children’s Act.
Can a mother relocate with the child without the father’s consent?
Not if the father has full parental responsibilities and rights. Major decisions require joint consent or a court order.
What is the most important factor in custody disputes?
The best interests of the child, as required by section 28 of the Constitution and section 7 of the Children’s Act.
Does the court favour mothers?
No. Courts favour stability, caregiving capacity, and the child’s welfare, not gender.
Can custody arrangements be changed later?
Yes, if circumstances materially change and it is in the child’s best interests.
Contact Michael Krawitz & Co. For Assistance With Children’s Act Custody
Children’s Act custody matters are among the most sensitive areas of South African law. Courts carefully weigh stability, parental involvement, emotional wellbeing, and the constitutional imperative that the best interests of the child are paramount.
As the judgment reminds us, custody disputes should not be driven by vengeance or emotion, but by reason, evidence, and the welfare of the child.
If you are facing a Children’s Act custody or contact dispute, early legal guidance is essential. Our Sandton-based family law team is ready to assist you with expert, strategic, and child-centred legal advice.
Your child’s future deserves nothing less. Contact us for an initial consultation.
Follow us on LinkedIn
